Here are the most significant
posts related to the
Rulers of Evil premise from Tupper Saussy's
short-lived blog Honest Things, April 2005 to
May 2006. He abandoned this effort shortly thereafter
because he considered it too burdensome to be merely a
“commentator.” He passed away in March 2007 just after
completing a music project he enjoyed. The blog had
stayed online for quite some time, but sadly here in
2025 I looked for the blog and discovered it had been
removed. This is typical of the extent his work is being
scrubbed from everywhere. His books used to be in
libraries, now they are nowhere to be found. In my view
the most important of these posts are his very first
blog post in this effort,
"Death of a Salesman," a piece that should be read
every time a pope passes away and Rome prepares to name
another one (as is the case at the time of this post),
"Being Jerked Around,"
about how routine it is for the media to "catastrophize
the imagination" in the service of Rome, and
"Intellectual
Genocide," about the myriad insidious ways Rome
labors to make itself mainstream by pretending to be on
whatever side you favor, especially one that foments
more rage. Forgive me, I will allow
Mr. Saussy
to share here, I think it will be edifying.
***
SATURDAY, APRIL 09, 2005
Death of a
Salesman
Never in history has a funeral
been reported in such emotional detail to so large an
audience. You got the feeling that ABC, CBS, CNN, FOX,
and NBC had each not only lost its chief benefactor, but
also was preparing the world to receive and adore his
successor. Many people found this irritating. I found it
appropriate and instructive.
If you've read Rulers of Evil,
you know where I come from: what we consider the secular
world lives, moves, and has its being in the Roman
Catholic Church. This notion was dramatically
corroborated last week by the appearance at Rome of
virtually every world leader, pious and grieving. That
the United States is a Roman Catholic country was
likewise proved by the presence of the gaggle of
American presidents paying their respects to the Holy
Father's corpse. None of them said "Rome rules" but,
hey, actions speak louder than words.
The media devoted billions of
dollars’ worth of airtime teaching the inner operations
of the Catholic Church, involving this and future
generations in the Vatican's most urgent concerns. The
anchors even showed us unbelievers, Jews, Muslims, and
protestant evangelicals devouring the bait and receiving
the hook. Surely this was the most elaborate example of
well-planned, well-organized holy salesmanship since the
marketing of Augustus Caesar to a strife-torn world a
generation before Mary delivered Jesus.
Rome rules the world by divine
appointment, and with the temporal might of the United
States. Over that small assembly of souls who have been
called to follow Scripture rather than Church
traditions, Rome has no authority whatsoever, except to
terrorize, condemn, capture, and punish those who stray
off into error.
The future of freedom looks
sanctimoniously phony on television. Truth is rarer in
American communication than Bible-reading in a public
school or in a devoutly Catholic family.
Thank God for the gift of
Scripture, where freedom is real and Truth abounds.
Without it I couldn't figure anything out. With it,
nothing in the world baffles me, and all my decisions
are risk-free. Scripture empowers us with understanding
which we are obligated to share, "providing for honest
things, not only in the sight of the Lord, but also in
the sight of men."
MONDAY, APRIL 11, 2005
Forty years in the making
The "end-time" prophecies of
Isaiah, Daniel, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Jesus, and John have
intrigued and baffled me for most of my life.
For about 9 minutes, back in the
mid-1970s, I took leave of my senses and actually
imagined I might be caught up bodily with other
Christians and sucked into Heaven while the unfortunate
left-behinds suffered a holocaust sparked by that
smooth-talking Antichrist. Reason and scripture
prevailed, thank God, and I left the rapture to
Christian science-fiction writers and their adoring
fans.
The publication of Rulers of
Evil attracted the attention of the historicists, who
assert that most biblical prophecy was fulfilled with
the death and resurrection of Jesus and the subsequent
rise of the Roman papacy as Antichrist who introduced
the Tribulation. According to the historicists, about
all that remains until the end of the world is the
parousia -- the second coming -- of Christ to establish
his perfect, everlasting Kingdom here on earth for a
thousand years. That could happen at any time, they say.
But historicism left too many
things hanging. Probably its most disturbing flaw is
what C.S. Lewis considered "the most embarrassing verse
in the Bible." This is Jesus' promise that He would
return to judge and world and establish His Kingdom
within the lifetime of some of His disciples. "And he
was wrong," Lewis wrote. "He clearly knew no more about
the end of the world than anyone else." (The World's
Last Night, 1960).
There is one study of prophecy
that credits Jesus with perfect knowledge of the end of
the world. They call themselves preterists, from Matthew
24:34 in Latin: "this generation will not pass away (non
praeteribit) - till all these things be fulfilled." The
preterists say, and can demonstrate with scripture and
history, that the second coming occurred in A.D. 70 with
the destruction of Jerusalem by the Roman synarchy. The
devil and his antichrists and their fans were thrown
into the lake of fire and the new Israel, the New
Jerusalem, a spiritual kingdom ruled by Jesus, descended
to earth. It's still here and will stay everlastingly.
Wow. Suddenly prophecy makes sense, and to be a
Christian becomes a lot more empowering.
Preterism challenges centuries
of what may be deluded thinking among people who call
themselves Christian. The Bible is clear on how deluded
thinkers respond to such challenges: they scourge, plot
against, defame, stone, even crucify. Check out the
anti-preterist rhetoric on the web, and see for yourself
if it doesn't smack more of persecution than reason,
truth, clarity. (I expect to be attacked for saying
this.)
I think so highly of the
preterist view that I'm going to attend a conference
they're holding in Sparta, North Carolina the weekend of
May 12, 13, 14. The leading scholars in that discipline
will be on the program, and I want to hear everything
they have to say, and hopefully become acquainted with
them personally. I'm strictly a paying guest, and I
would encourage you -- if you're a little undecided on
biblical prophecy -- to attend as well. Here's the site:
http://www.lighthouseproductionsllc.com/
And if the book of Revelation
has always mystified you, by all means read Kurt
Simmons' magnificent new book "The Consummation of the
Ages." Kurt will address the Sparta conference as well.
http://www.preteristcentral.com/
Time to climb into the car and
head for Miami.
SATURDAY, APRIL 09, 2005
Charles & Camilla
What a contrast. In a single
day, we turn from death in Rome to life in England!
The music said it all. The
obbligato of the pope's funeral was dismal, hopeless,
straggling; of the royal wedding joyfully complex,
stirring, heavenly, composed by Papa Bach and his
spiritual peers in the protestant spirit of obedience to
Scripture and new life in Christ.
It was amazing to see these two
major celebrities, the prince and princess, confessing
their faults and praying to their Lord Jesus Christ for
resolve to remain faithful to one another. It would have
been even more amazing had these items flowed from their
own hearts and minds, rather than from a page written by
the Church of England. But that's the problem with
religion: an orthodoxy too easily becomes a recitable
dogma giving the appearance of piety quite apart from
the real thing. This is why Scripture cautions us always
to look to the fruits to know anyone's heart.
I'm now turning the television
off for a good while.
SUNDAY, APRIL 24, 2005
Preterism amplified
Under "Forty years in the
making" (see below) peoplenotsheeple commented to rafe
on why he believes the preterist view is flawed.
Christ's literal and bodily
ascent will be reversed in the second coming, according
to peoplenotsheeple. "That means he must return
literally and bodily. I am happy to have the Spirit as a
'helper' and as an 'earnest' (downpayment) toward
salvation. However, this isn't all there is to the
promise of 'thy kingdom come... on earth as it is in
heaven,' or the promise that the earth will be as full
of the knowledge of the LORD as the sea is full of
water.
"Long after the events of A.D.
70, John wrote in Revelation 1:7: 'Look! He is coming
with the clouds, and every eye will see Him, including
those who pierced Him. And all the families of the earth
will mourn over Him. This is certain. Amen.'
"As my eye hasn't seen it, I
figure it has yet to happen." issues are brought up here
that can be instructive to us all. First, there's
evidence that John wrote Revelation well before A.D. 70,
and that his prophecy points to that date. A late date
for Revelation (upon which futurism is founded) is built
on the assumption that John was banished to Patmos by
the Emperor Domitian in the A.D. nineties. Preterists
agree that John was banished by an emperor named
Domitian, but in the A.D. sixties. You see, Nero was
known as Nero Domitian.
I'm still a schoolboy on the
subject of preterism. So I invited the distinguished
preterist historian Kurt Simmons to comment on
peoplenotsheeple's comment. Kurt writes:
"Peoplenotsheeple is not
understanding the spiritual lessons behind the symbols
he mentions (desert blossoming like the rose, etc). He
is looking for these things to occur in the natural,
rather than in the spiritual realm. The language about
the wilderness blossoming spoke to the desolated cities
of Israel from the Assyrians and Babylonians; they sat
uninhabited for decades while the Jews were in
captivity. The return of the captivity would see the
desert come under cultivation again and thus 'blossom as
the rose,' the waste places would be rebuilt, and so
forth. This became a type of the kingdom of the
Messiah: The spiritual waste
places of mankind's fallenness would be restored and
regenerated by conversion of men's hearts and cleansing
from sin by the blood and gospel of Christ.
"The best single passage showing
this is Amos 9:11-15, which is cited in Acts by James,
showing its true fulfillment in Christ. The kingdom is
the church; in the church the various nations of people
are at peace with one another; they turn their swords
into plowshares. In the world, nation still wars with
nation, but in the church this is not true.
"The seed of the gospel has
already grown into a great tree (church) that fills the
earth and provides habitation for the birds of every
nation. The sons of God were manifested at the
destruction of
Jerusalem and the plagues that
overtook the Roman Empire. 30,000 were killed by a
plague in Rome in A.D. 65 during the very first full
year of persecution of the church; a whirlwind destroyed
crops in Campania, causing famine.
"When Nero committed suicide,
the empire was thrown into recurring civil wars as
different men sought to obtain the throne; hundreds of
thousands were killed in these battles (in several
instances 40,000 on each side in one battle alone! - see
Tacitus). This demonstrated to the world that Christians
were God's sons and they were inviting wrath by
persecuting them.
"The resurrection, of course,
was into the spirit realm of Heaven, not physical bodies
upon earth. So, looking to meet these people while on
earth is to be disappointed."
Thanks, rafe, peoplenotsheeple
and Kurt. The preterist is continually mindful that
Scripture was written FOR us, not TO us. When John
speaks of everyone seeing the return of Christ,
including those who pierced Him, he is addressing the
churches of first-century Asia, not us. Without an
awareness of time and addressee, the terrain of prophecy
is strewn with quicksand.
WEDNESDAY, JULY 20, 2005
Being
jerked around
Rulers whip their subjects into
line by catastrophizing the imagination.
To be catastrophized, you have to believe that
rulers speak truth.
You have to be willing to be jerked around.
When CNN means to tell me about
the London bombings or about a reporter imprisoned for
guarding her news source, the message I get is that the
federal government means to jerk me around.
It means, as usual, to deceive me.
Am I paranoid?
Let me recite my understanding of the
relationship between government, media, the world, and
myself.
Government does not control the
media; it's quite the other way around.
The media actually choose the personalities that
run government.
What?
Media aren't the fourth estate?
The watchdog?
Exactly the opposite.
ABC News, The Associated Press, NBC News, CNN,
CBS News, and Fox News own a very secret, very private
consortium that nowadays goes by the name of Voter News
Service.
Expect the name to change soon, if it hasn't already.
http://wesavedemocracy.org/election_projections_rigging.html
VNS provides the software,
proprietary and unreviewable by Congressional oversight,
that determines America's rulers ~ i.e., the winners in
presidential, U.S. house and senate, state
gubernatorial, and other select races.
Today VNS is in like Flynn.
And will be for a very long time. The purpose of
the Florida hanging chad operation that barred Al Gore
from the White House was to engineer popular consent to
VNS. It
worked. The
people consented.
They believed the media and the media chose
George W. Bush ~ twice.
Can there be any doubt that the media also chose
his wars?
What can you say after you've said "embedded"?
Welcome to cybernetic democracy.
Okay, so who controls the media
that own VNS?
Well, the internet is loaded with sites eager to
expose the media magnates by name.
But one can get by on a lot less information,
information that's also a lot more permanent. All I
really need to know is the spiritual basis of the
humanity running the media.
Surely it is not Christian ~ by which I mean it
(1) does not worship Jesus Christ in spirit and in
truth, and (2) does not believe the Bible is the sole
infallible authority governing human life.
By this standard, the media can
be ~ as it is ~ controlled by a mix of atheists, deists,
pantheists, Buddhists, Muslims, Jews, and nominal
Christians such as Roman Catholics and many of the
protestant evangelical sects.
At the head of these faiths I put the Papacy, who
rules the world apart from the Body of Christ.
Christ rules His own; Benedict XVI is in charge
of everyone else, and by divine mandate: "Like as ye
have forsaken me, and served strange gods in your land,
so shall ye serve strangers in a land that is not
yours." Jeremiah 5:19
The Papacy defines social
communications as "the press, movies, radio, television
and the like," and stated the Church's policy thereon in
an important decree entitled "Inter Mirifica" (Paul VI,
1964). The
Catholic Church possesses an "inherent right... to have
at its disposal and to employ any of these media insofar
as they are necessary or useful for the instruction of
Christians and all its efforts for the welfare of
souls." Now,
when a Pope says "Christians," he has in mind people
whose salvation is dispensed from the Church and its
priests, not by the Holy Spirit of Christ Himself.
The "welfare of souls," likewise, is dispensed
from the Church's global treasury, which includes all
economies dependent upon central banks of issue.
As the old Spanish proverb goes, "Don Dinero es
muy Catolico."
Inter Mirifica mandated
Catholics to invest their resources in a social
communication that would ensure the Church's role in
controlling souls who did not look exclusively to Jesus
Christ for their welfare.
Since the Pope's official title "Vicar of Christ"
is not disputed by any member of the United Nations, nor
has been rendered impotent by any judicial proceeding,
the conclusion is inescapable that HIs Holiness does
indeed rule affairs of the world as Christ's viceroy.
This harmonizes with the declaration, stated in
the Bible, that all power in heaven and earth was given
to Christ Jesus in the first century.
Since the Church of Rome's history cannot support
a claim of consistently Christlike behavior, one must
decide that either the Bible is nonsense or that Rome
serves Christ as disciplinarian of the ungodly.
The latter is my deduction from history,
Scripture, and current events; you can study it in
greater detail in RULERS OF EVIL, www.tuppersaussy.com.
In any event, the Papacy, which
includes all earthly secular power, does not rule
affairs between Christ and His disciples.
In fact, earthly secular power often protects the
true Body of Christ from evil in the world ~ just as it
was appointed to do thousands of years ago. This is why
I heartily approve of the Papacy and its manner of
discharging its responsibilities in the Kingdom of God.
The world is terribly wicked and
deceitful, so the Christian disciple expects grisly
deceptions in all social communication, even human
sacrifice disguised as acts of terror committed by a
mysterious villainy.
Perhaps the most ambitious, and most ineptly
performed, of this generation's deceptions was the 9-11
2001 "attack" on New York and the Pentagon.
You must studiously ignore mountains of hard
evidence to the contrary in order to believe the dogma
that a gaggle of inept suicidal Muslim fanatics
conquered the impenetrable American aeronautical
infrastructure long enough to bring down a number of New
York skyscrapers and pierce the indomitable Pentagon.
Truth is, without something like
9-11, it would have been impossible for an American
president to ask his people to divest themselves of
constitutionally secured rights, along with hundreds of
billions in purchasing power to expand his bureaucracy
at home and, while he's at it, forcefully restructure
governments abroad.
9-11 made the impossible happen.
And now, four years into the impossible, we're
benefitting from the economic system spawned by the
deception.
Minds that love fiction more than truth have been shaped
by a lie that will not be undone, and in this life the
real perps will go unpunished.
It's biblical: get used to it.
The London bombings of July
2005, which created the largest crime scene in English
history, appear to have been designed by the same team.
Consider the facts.
One day beforehand, the British were against the
war on terror, the Ministry of Defense had announced it
was drafting plans to pull British armed forces out of
Iraq and Afghanistan, while Tony Blair's government
enjoyed a less than 15% approval rating.
Eight of the world's leading nations had just
gathered in a summit meeting in Gleneagles, Scotland.
G-8 had been forecast to be confrontational.
In the opening session, Blair was seeking common
ground between his American allies and the EU nations.
Suddenly word came of the blasts and carnage.
Blair was rushed to London where he inaugurated,
with Churchillian hero-speak, the UK's determination to
prevail over terrorism.
The bombings simply checkmated all opposition to
the war on terror.
To be against the war now is to be against
England.
The bombings also changed
attitudes at G-8.
Murdo MacLeod wrote in The Scotsman that "No one
could now appear to be the bad guy... [or] allow
themselves to be seen to humiliate Blair in his own
country in the wake of such a tragedy." The bombings
motivated "the so-called sherpas ~ government fixers who
pave the way for agreement when their leaders gather ~
into overdrive," wrote MacLeod, "using the myriad rooms
of the Gleneagles Hotel to reconstitute disagreements
into compromises... A failure to make some sort of
agreement would be seen as a victory for terrorism."
The ease with which disaster
improved a government's fortunes made me think of Martin
Luther King's assassination on April 4, 1968.
Weeks earlier, the unpopular and dictatorial
Civil Rights Bill of 1968 had lost most of its steam in
the House of Representatives.
Suddenly, King was shot; six days later the bill
swept through the House 249 to 171, and Lyndon Johnson
signed it into law on April 11th.
The April 19th issue of Time magazine noted,
"King's death immediately realigned forces on both
sides." Of
course, evidence produced over the decades acquits James
Earl Ray of the assassination for which he died in
prison. This
same evidence discloses a plot developed by the rulers
of evil, in which Ray was an unaware (and Roman
Catholic) pawn.
I knew James Earl Ray, and edited and published
his autobiography, "Tennessee Waltz," which you can
purchase at
http://www.tuppersaussy.com/html/store/museum%20bookstore.html
We're talking about military
operations here, and don't forget the U.S. President is
a General whose official title is Commander-in-Chief of
the Armed Forces.
Generals go to school on Sun-Tzu, the oriental
strategist whose writings were first published in a
western language by the Papacy's war-makers, the
Jesuits, in 1772.
Sun-Tzu said that the wise general must deceive
his own soldiers, his own people, sometimes even the
sovereign he serves, and expose them to dangers and
suffering in order to achieve the greater victory for
the kingdom.
Sun-Tzu's most highly prized
weapon is the ruse, an action intended to deceive.
For the deciphering of ruses, the world has been
trained to depend upon media journalism ~ investigative
reporting.
How would American voters have discovered the Nixon
administration's policy of deception if not for
Bernstein and Woodward?
Once they felt secure that eagle-eyed journalists
were tracking corruption in all levels of government,
Americans let down their guard.
The legend of fearless
journalism persists, even though most journalists today
seem to be afraid of their own shadow.
Reporters, like the rulers they're believed to be
monitoring, must subscribe to the dogma.
They must conform to the official line on
disasters ~ that Lee Harvey Oswald killed JFK by firing
three shots at him from the back and one from the front.
They must pretend satisfaction that the evidence
buried in the government's furtive demolition of the
Murrah Building would have produced no evidence that the
damage was done by state-of-the-art nuclear devices
planted strategically throughout the building rather
than Tim McVeigh's hokey fertilizer bomb. They must
pretend to believe that a Boeing 757 squeezed itself
into the Pentagon through a hole smaller than the
aircraft's diameter and then vanished ~ engines,
aluminum, passengers, crew, hijackers, black box,
baggage, everything ~ into thin air.
But let William Rodriguez start
talking about his experience on 9-11 and Fearless
Journalist is struck blind, deaf, and dumb.
If you know Rodriguez' plight, you didn't hear it
through VNS. In case you haven't heard, Rodriguez was
the WTC janitor on duty in the basement at ground zero
the morning of 9-11. Moments before the jetliner crashed
into the north tower, Rodriquez heard and felt
explosions rock the basement sub-levels. He says walls
were cracking around him. Moments before the crash in
the sky. Before, get it? Among the many people he
rescued was Felipe David, who was severely burned by the
basement explosions. Felipe heard and felt the
explosions before the upper crash.
Rodriguez was cited for his
heroism, but his factual testimony offends government.
There cannot have been sub-basement explosions before
the jetliner hit the 90th floor. This ruins the
government's and fearless journalism's scenario of
lone-nut jetliners.
Non-VNS journalist Greg
Szymanski wrote, "Rodriguez said immediately after 9/11
some newspapers picked [his story] up but his words were
never taken seriously and [were] quickly forgotten."
www.arcticbeacon.com
"During the 9-11 hearings," said
Rodriguez, "NBC brought a crew out to my house and spent
a day taping my story but they never did air a word of
it. Since then, some reporters and commentators have
subtly warned me to keep quiet, told me my life could be
in jeopardy and warned me that I really didn’t
understand who I was dealing with."
Note that it was reporters and
commentators who warned Rodriguez to keep quiet. So all
the more reason for rulers to remind us that fearless
journalism is still the American way. Ergo, the jailing
of Judith Miller for refusing to reveal her sources, a
jerkaround designed to lay to rest any suspicion that
journalists may not be risking their lives, liberty, and
sacred honor to report the truth undiminished.
Hey, Judith ~ if you don't mind
suffering to protect your sources, here's one that
guarantees a very big story. Meet my friend William
Rodriguez.
WEDNESDAY, JULY 27, 2005
Who speaks for Al Qaeda?
Every government has the
resources to create and maintain an enemy. The more
nebulous the better. A nebulous enemy that looms large
in the public imagination can be a cash cow, especially
if it can be portrayed terrifyingly enough. The people
will spare nothing defending against it.
Federal planners know this well.
The ground rules were expressed in the famous pamphlet
published a year prior to September 11, 2001 by the
Project for the New American Century (PNAC), whose
members are a roster of the present Bush administration.
PNAC declared that in order to
create an American presence in the Middle East,
particularly Iraq, a new Pearl Harbor would be
necessary. 9-11 provided the necessary catalyst to put
PNAC's global war plan into effect.
On September 12, 2001, Donald
Rumsfeld advocated invading Iraq. Congress immediately
allocated $40 billion to fight terrorism. The U.S.
defense budget for 2002 increased nearly 12 percent over
2001. The budget was increased exponentially in the
years following, in line with the PNAC manifesto.
Al Qaeda is the perfect nebulous
enemy. The irony is that television programming burgeons
with forensic criminal investigation shows, yet the most
important theatre requiring forensic investigation ~
terrorist bomb sites ~ waive forensic investigation
because everyone believes the government's (and media's)
assertions that Al Qaeda is the culprit.
"But Al Qaeda admitted to the
London bombings." Okay, and how do we know it was Al
Qaeda that admitted? Which impartial magistrate has
cross-examined Al Qaeda? How would Al Qaeda go about
proving the admissions were made by an impostor? Who
speaks for Al Qaeda? How would such spokesman avoid
being arrested upon identification and detained
indefinitely, detained incommunicado?
Meanwhile, the people are
obliged to receive statements of government and media
spokesmen as gospel truth. What a moneymaker!
TUESDAY, JANUARY 03, 2006
The Christmas Litmus
I have numerous friends who rant
at secular humanists for trying to remove "Merry
Christmas" from the American vernacular. They charge
that certain Jewish powers would eradicate Christ from
our national heritage by doing away with Christmas
verbiage and iconography. I think perhaps the charge has
substance, but I also think changing "Merry Christmas"
to "Happy Holidays" might be a good thing. Before you
call me infidel, please hear me out.
The Bible tells us that to deny
Jesus Christ is the promised Messiah is to be his enemy.
David, under God's inspiration, tells us that God
converts Christ's enemies into footstools for him, low
seats for resting the feet. In other words, God drafts
Christ's enemies into Christ's service. Therefore, we
can expect Christ-deniers ~ regardless of whatever
personal motives may be driving them ~ to serve the will
of God. Remember: it was Christ-deniers that made the
crucifixion succeed as the mechanism by which all
repentant sinners have been brought into the family of
God. God uses the ignorance and hatred of his enemies to
carry out his purposes.
Christian historians are now
fairly certain that Christ was not born in winter, but
indeed in the fall, and that Christmas is nothing more
than the delightful pagan Saturnalia repackaged in
Christian imagery. If this is so, then the institution
of Christmas is the work of lying tongues, which God
despises.
Persuaded of this, and also that
scripture discourages commemorating birthdays at all (in
fact, the only two birthday celebrations reported in the
Bible are associated with grisly death), I became
convinced a dozen years ago that Christmas-keeping was
paying homage to a lie. An enquiry into biblical
languages informed me that the very term "Christmas" in
Greek signifies "Christ-detester" (Christ-miseo); in
Hebrew (Christ-m'ss') gives us "Christ-trial" in the
sense of "Christ-testing of men" or "the Christ test."
Christmas litmus. The word seems to be telling us that
if we buy into the messiah's birth on December 25, we
buy into haters of Christ and sing and preach and pray
with a lying tongue. By our own demeanor we prove the
Christ we adore is the fake one. And this would be a sin
to confess and repent of.
So I approve of efforts to
expunge Christ from the season of winter solstice. I
consider separating Christ from Christmas a work of God
preached and administered, like the crucifixion, by his
enemies.
And how do I observe the season?
Well, I enjoy the Saturnalian tradition of partying,
decorating, and gift-giving ~ let one and all take
respite from an otherwise dark and dreary time of year.
But the baby Jesus stuff I regard with benign disdain,
in the spirit of "Father, forgive them for they know not
what they do."
I look very carefully at how
people handle the above information. Do they seek
validation with a willingness to repent? Or do they
crucify the messenger? That's the real Christmas litmus.
THURSDAY, JANUARY 19, 2006
10 Easy Questions About Money
Watch out for a tsunami of
inflated Federal Reserve currency starting about
springtime.
As the fixed-income crowd shells
out more and more paper dollars for the same goods and
services, some might actually start looking at what the
Constitution says about money. (The quick course is my
little book "The Miracle On Main Street," if you can
find a copy. It's almost out of print.)
Thinking that in the original
edition there had been a section of ten questions to ask
any judge, James, a 6th-edition MOMS reader, asked me to
reiterate them. Well, there were no ten questions, but I
sat down and thought about it, and they just wrote
themselves.
I don't envision posing these in
a courtroom, but rather in a fireside chat with a friend
who happens to be a judge (or maybe practices law).
Judges resent surly questions, and can ignore them with
impunity. So be careful with these things.
1. Can Congress pass a law that
would cause a State to violate the Constitution?
2. Can a State declare anything
whatsoever to be a legal tender for all debts public and
private?
3. Can Congress declare anything
whatsoever to be a legal tender for all debts public and
private?
4. Does the Constitution declare
anything but gold and silver coin to be a legal tender
for all debts public and private?
5. Does Congress have any power
not given it by the Constitution?
6. Can a State do something the
Constitution denies it power to do?
7. Has Article I Section 10 of
the Constitution been amended?
8. Has any Supreme Court
decision rendered null and void the provisions of
Article I Section 10 of the Constitution?
9. If Congress cannot cause a
State to violate the Constitution, and if neither a
State nor Congress can make any thing but gold and
silver coin a legal tender for the payment of all debts
public and private, and if the Constitution does not
empower Congress to employ a monetary system other than
consists of gold and silver coin, then why does Congress
provide, and State and federal courts enforce payment of
debts in, a monetary system which the Constitution
prohibits?
10. How should a United States
citizen exercise the civil right to the monetary system
already provided by the Constitution but denied by
Congress and the States?
WEDNESDAY, MAY 17, 2006
Intellectual genocide
The DaVinci Code effect
I watch what people take on
airplanes to read. Years ago, I bought a copy of Lewis
Thomas's Lives of A Cell because I spotted it in the
hands of more than a few passengers on several
successive flights. A couple of years ago, airborne
book-spotting impelled me to read The DaVinci Code.
Honestly, this one topped them all. It was as though
someone were passing out free copies at the ticket
counter.
The Code is about conspiracy,
and I've been a conspiracy geek since JFK was shot from
in front 42 years ago. I study not only who pulls these
monstrous capers off but also the mechanisms that
discipline the silence of witnesses and make people
comfortable believing lies.
I hoped Code would lead me into
exciting new terrain, but the more I got into it, the
more alienated from the reading public I became. Alas,
Dan Brown's book is all trompe l'oeil: it employs false
instruments to discover what appear to be hidden truths.
It transforms the believing reader into a wise fool.
More tellingly, it leads the believing reader to root
for the Roman Catholic Church and to sympathize with
worshippers of a pagan goddess. The DaVinci Code mangles
the perceptions ~ not exactly what a paying customer
expects of a book.
I believe the movie will commit
intellectual genocide. I don't plan to see it any more
than I plan to suck on a sugar cube soaked in LSD.
There is an alternative to this
pack of lies, a book that reveals unseen truths that can
actually improve the reader's awareness of how the world
operates both theologically and politically. This book
is entitled Rulers of Evil. Unfortunately, its author
happens to be myself, which means the present article
will be self-serving, and you're forgiven for abandoning
it without further perusal.
I shouldn't have to hawk my own
book. That responsibility once belonged to
HarperCollins, who dropped it not long after 9/11. Why?
My literary agent believes Rulers of Evil contained
information Rupert Murdoch wished to suppress because of
his many vital associations with the Vatican. That makes
sense to me, and I can't blame Mr. Murdoch for wanting
to distance himself from my book. Actually, I was
careful not to attack the Church of Rome; I simply
presented numerous evidences of its rulership of global
political systems, including that of the United States
of America.
More than a few readers of my
book, who call themselves ROEders, have commented on the
similarities between ROE and DVC. Both contain shocking
information, but page for page, there's more in ROE than
in DVC, and it's infinitely more useful since DVC is
fantasy and ROE is fact. "It's the difference," one
ROEder wrote me, "between junk food and health food."
Talk about goddess worship. A
goddess named "Freedom" stands atop the U. S. Capitol
building. That is undeniable fact. Also factual is that
she's officially classified as “the only authorized
Symbol of American heritage.” What you probably don't
know is where she came from. Do you? If not, you'll find
out in Chapter 22 of Rulers of Evil. It's an amazing
story, and it's not fiction.
Let me tempt you. On December 8,
1854, Pope Pius IX defined the doctrine of Immaculate
Conception, the notion (suggested nowhere in the Bible)
that the Virgin Mary, like Jesus, was conceived free of
sin. Within days of Pius's encyclical, Congress hastened
to pass legislation that assured the construction of a
cupola atop the Capitol, to be surmounted by a divine
woman. According to the official publication The Dome of
the United States Capitol: An Architectural History
(1922), "Never before or since has an addition to the
Capitol been so eagerly embraced by Congress."
Bear in mind, most members of
Congress at the time were Protestants traditionally
leery of anything that smacked of Catholicism. Yet the
goddess was sculpted in Rome, and her installation in
December 1863 was layered in hidden Roman Catholic
ceremony ~ which Rulers of Evil discloses in context for
the first time ever.
How could a goddess answering
the definition of the Roman Virgin Mary have been
hoisted to a position of sovereignty over the lawmaking
body of the United States? Rulers of Evil answers this
provocative question as well. Catholicism takes control
over non-Catholic legislatures through a military
organization of which the CIA is merely a component.
This is not fantasy. It is fact supported by hundreds of
footnotes pointing you to viable sources.
But that's just for openers. ROE
establishes that Rome's influence over American
government began long before Freedom was set atop the
Capitol. In fact, the evidence will lead you, as it did
me, to conclude that the American Revolution was a
product of Vatican military strategy in which two
protestant nations, England and her American colonies,
were pitted against one another in bloody battle ~ the
ultimate victor being the invisible instigator. Roman
victory over the United States was sealed in the
American Constitution's prohibition against religious
tests being required of governmental office-holders.
Today, the majority of Congressional and Senate
committee heads are subjects of the Roman papacy, as is
the United States Supreme Court. Fantasy? No way.
These facts are not presented in
an argumentative, angry manner. Indeed, no one is more
comfortable with them than I. There exists in the Bible
scriptural authority for the Papacy to do the things it
does, and I commend Rome for the sheer cunning and
proficiency of its secular operations.
In the latter chapters I discuss
how Roman America handicaps only those who choose to
ignore the reality of its existence. To know this
reality is the first step in establishing one's personal
freedom from it. For although Rome rules its subjects
harshly, it peaceably excludes all who demonstrate they
are ruled directly by the Authority upon whom Rome
relies. This kind of knowledge can be incredibly
profitable, and is why Rulers of Evil is subtitled
"Useful Knowledge About Governing Bodies."
Well, if you've read this far,
maybe you're wanting to own a copy of Rulers of Evil.
You can find it on the net at all kinds of inflated
prices, starting with Amazon and eBay. If you don't have
any money, you can probably find a copy in your local
public library.
My website still sells some
collector's first edition autographed copies for $50.00,
and the regular HarperCollins edition at $19.95. Go
here, and pay with PayPal.
http://tuppersaussy.com/html/store/museum%20bookstore.html
They'll never make a movie of
Rulers of Evil because it's already running ~ in,
through, and around your own life. You won't see it
until you open the covers and start reading.
***
Scripture |
Homepage |
Site Map
Tupper Saussy Page
|